Why I’m Pleased I Failed The VCDX

Before I start this blog post, I want to mention that I am of sound mind and that all my faculties are functioning.  With that cleared up, I want to start with some context.

Throughout my IT career, I have always built my knowledge based on what I believe is credible within the market place.  This hasn’t ever been from a technical perspective, rather a business point of view.  Don’t get me wrong technology can be cool, but being cool without a use case means you won’t have a very long shelf life.

The pace of change within IT is significant, to stay up to date and relevant requires dedication, discipline and perhaps most important of all time.  Time away from family and friends locked away in a quite room reading, watching online courses and spending hours building environments in your home lab.  With this in mind, when I focus on studying technology, I want to use my time efficiently on what I believe will yield the highest reward for the least investment.

It was back in 2014 when I defended the VCDX-DCV unsuccessfully,  you can read about the effort to prepare in ‘VCDX Submission – By The Numbers‘ and what went wrong in the post ‘VCDX – What Went Wrong?‘  This may sound counter intuitive, but the path to defending the VCDX is a journey that I would recommend anyone to take as it pushes you to the next level in terms of understanding business requirements and translating those into a technical solution. It sharpens your technical knowledge and hones your written and presentation skills, enabling you to quickly dissect and disseminate relevant information from customer meetings/workshops into proposals, high level and low level designs.

So why am I pleased that I failed the VCDX, if I enjoyed and would recommend the journey?  A number of reasons which I have highlighted below.

Market Demand

The requirement for traditional virtualisation skills are shrinking, customers are upgrading and expanding their clusters without needing to engage third party companies.  They are used to maintaining interopability matrix’s between vSphere components and have performed numerous inplace upgrades on their existing hardware.

At the point of infrastructure lifecycle refreshes, customers are often looking to consolidate and to achieve a greater return on investment.  The advent of hyper converged technologies to simplify the ‘hardware stack’ along with ongoing maintenance is something which makes sense both operationally and financially.

A customer might require some assistance to migrate to the target platform, but when they are consuming it, where does the next the next requirement come from?

Pigeon Hole

If I had passed the VCDX, I believe that I would have been labelled ‘the virtualisation guy’.  From your employers perspective, they may have invested in your VCDX journey then they want to use your skillset and will want to ‘tout’ your expertise in RFP responses, proposals and in front of customers to gain an ROI from their investment.

For some, I’m sure this makes perfect sense and they would relish being the ‘virtualisation guy’.  However I prefer being the ‘guy’ who makes things happen and can lead a project across every technology area rather than being an SME.

I believe that being ‘pigeon holed’ would have reduced my career opportunities and earning potential and I wouldn’t have been in the position I am today.


When you have invested time and effort in obtaining an elite certification it is natural to want to keep it up to date.  This then leads to the treadmill effect, renewing your certification by passing the ‘Advanced’ level exam every two years to maintain your ‘VCDX’ certificate.

I would have felt obliged to stay on this treadmill which would have meant continuing to focus on traditional virtualisation to maintain top percentile skill levels.

Perhaps this is unique to me, but after spending such a large amount of time learning the intricacies of ESXi, vCenter, SRM and vROPS, I had become an SME but if I was completely unenthused by vSphere.  I wasn’t able to summon the excitement or passion to continue learning, I needed something fresh to focus on.


Over the past three years since I failed the VCDX, the customer landscape has changed.  Clients want to leverage the public cloud to enable them to expand their datacentre footprint around the globe without the cost of standing up their own environments.  They want to utilise IaaS, PaaS and SaaS technologies such as Office 365 to reduce the burden of maintaining hardware and infrastructure related items which bring little to no value to the business.  Customers are seeking alternatives to costly areas such as DR where they can leverage the public cloud to reduce their on-premises DR footprint whilst maintaining the same service levels.

The opportunities that I see from customers no longer have traditional virtualisation as the main piece of their requirements, it is now a small subsection of a transformation programme.


I used to believe in VMware as a business, the technology and innovation they used to drive was second to none.  However, I feel that they are struggling to stay relevant and have lost their way.  In the core virtualisation space, the feedback from customers is that ESXi is expensive and on the next infrastructure lifestyle refresh they will be investigating reducing their ESXi estate or replacing it entirely.

VMware tried hard with vCloud Air but basic offerings such as DRaaS fell short see blog post vCloud Air DRaaS – The Good, Bad & Ugly leading to customers seeking alternatives.  It was without great surprise that VMware decided they couldn’t compete with the likes of AWS and Azure so have partnered with AWS in a bid to maintain relevance and market share.  This small statement alone speaks volumes,  I believe this also links into vRA as well, how long until these businesses decide they no longer want to manage and maintain their bespoke workflows and seek to leverage SaaS or PaaS offerings?

I do however believe that VMware got Horizon View correct and is a viable alternative to Citrix in the VDI and application publishing market.  Again though I’m not sure for how long as recent customer demand has leaned towards leveraging the public cloud to create global ‘VDI’ pods (which I have designed and delivered using Citrix on Microsoft Azure).  Unless VMware have a suitable answer to this I can see Horizon View sales dwindling.

The announcement of VMware on AWS did spark my interest, I’m not entirely convinced this will be a game changer.  I will put together some thoughts on this on another blog post, as I’m really struggling to see the benefits apart from ‘legacy systems’ which could be the market share that VMware is after.  Again though, I’m sure that Storage Spaces Direct will soon become a PaaS offering on Microsoft Azure giving you the ability to run ‘legacy systems’ on public cloud.

Final Thought

For me, the journey to VCDX and also failing has been enlightening.  I was a fairly new starter with my employer when I embarked on the elite certification, this provided early visibility of my capabilities which enabled me to work on some great customer engagements.  Perhaps more importantly was the failure of the VCDX which meant that I wasn’t ‘pigeon holed’ but was seen as a person who makes things happen.  Which lead to the opportunity to work with customers across multiple technologies transforming them to utilise both on-premises and public cloud.

This may sound like it comes from a place of unicorns and rainbows, but I get out of bed everyday and look forward to work, this isn’t only due to my awesome colleagues but the sheer breadth and depth of the customer solutions I’m trusted to lead.  I thank my VCDX failure as the pivotal point in being able to achieve this.

Azure Updates – Summary of 2017 Enhancements

azureWhen you shift your focus from on-premises architecture to cloud based services, you notice that the velocity of updates and new features is relentless.  To give you an idea, over the last 12 months Microsoft have released over 500 updates on the Azure platform, some of these are feature enhancements, betas, public previews and new services.

Microsoft Azure is a moving target keeping up to date with enhancements is a full time job!

With this in mind, I thought I would share with you , the feature enhancements over the past few months that have had the biggest impact to the customers I work with.

Azure DevTest Labs – Ability to set an expiry date on virtual machines

We all know that development environments should only be up and running for a short amount of time to facilitate an application enhancement or initiative.  However in reality the virtual machines which were only meant to be temporary, end up being on all the time with everyone afraid to power them off ‘just in case something bad happens’.

With Azure DevTest Labs we can now harness the inbuilt functionality to set expiry dates to virtual machines.  Sounds trivial but what a great feature addition to manage the compute resources around a VM lifecycle.

Read more here.

Azure Automation – Start/Stop VMs (Preview)

We are used to having our on-premises VMs running 24×7.   Because we have already invested in the compute and storage infrastructure so what is the real use case of shutting them down?  Instead we sweat our assets for the three to five year hardware lifecycle and rinse and repeat.`

Taking the same architecture principles to a cloud based platform increases costs.  Why not get smart and reduce your consumption costs by targeting applications to when users access them?  If HR only work Mon-Fri 9-5 and access Sage during this time frame, then why not power on the VM at 8am and shut it down at 6pm?  Reducing your Azure consumption costs by 58% over a 12 month period.

Read more here.

Azure Managed Disks

When running virtual machines in Azure it’s not just a simple case of creating a storage account, factors such as the number of virtual machines per storage account with their IOPS requirements as well as the impact that backups have need to be taken into consideration.

These manual considerations can be negated to a point using Azure Managed Disks in which Azure handles the Storage Account in the back end reducing your management overhead.

With the general availability release of Azure Managed Disks integrate with Azure Backup and also Disk Encryption.

Read more here.

Automated Backup for SQL Server 2014 and 2016 Virtual Machines

It can be common for enterprises to backup SQL Server databases outside of the general backup schedule applied to other applications.  With the release of Automated Backup for SQL Server 2014 and 2016 Virtual Machines this can be automated for you with the creation of the VM.

With a daily backup and a retention period of 30 days, this adds another layer of protection to your backup routine.

Read more here and here.

Azure Backup Instant File Recovery (Preview)

Azure Backup has always done a job, but backing up a VM level has had its disadvantages namely having to restore an entire VM to an alternate location to get back a single file or folder.

Azure Backup Instant File Recovery creates a writable mount point attached to the VM you want to restore data too using an iSCSI target.  This simplifies the process and reduces management overhead.

Read more here.

Azure Security Center Enhancements (Preview)

The Azure Cyber Security  team have announced a number of the new enhancements which are in preview.  The most poignant ones are:

  • Application White Listing – Allow only the authorised executables to run within the virtual machine, with Azure Security Center discovering and recommending white listing policies
  • Just in Time Network Access to VM’s – Reduce your attack surface by only allowing access to common ports when required

By simply deploying the above two changes, I can see a benefit for most organisations to enhance their security footprint.

Read more here.

Microsoft Azure Concepts – Operations Management Suite

omsWhen deploying workloads to the public cloud, the question arises ‘how do you monitor them’?  This then leads to further questions such as:

  • Will my existing monitoring solution support Microsoft Azure workloads such as PaaS?
  • Do I need to purchase extra licenses or upgrade my existing licenses?
  • Do I need to have two different monitoring solutions? One for on-premises and one for the public cloud?

Each of the above questions then leads to a myriad of further questions around the deployment mechanism, how data is collected, stored and displayed.  How are you altered of issues or potential issues?  How do you capacity plan for resources in the cloud?  How do you monitoring specific application workloads?

To answer these questions and more Microsoft released Operations Management Suite which became generally available in January 2016.

What is Operations Management Suite?

Operations Management Suite is ‘Management as a Service’ or MaaS for short.  It runs in Microsoft Azure and can provide visibility into your on-premises and Microsoft Azure based workloads, providing a consistent monitoring approach across datacentres.

OMS is broken down into four key components which at a high level are:

  • Insight and Analytics to collect, correlate, search and act on log and performance data generated by operating systems and applications. Providing real time analysis of information and potential issues.
  • Automation & Control which enables a consistent approach to control and appliance by leveraging desired state configuration, change tracking and update management.
  • Security and Compliance focuses on identifying, assessing and mitigate risks to infrastructure. Collecting and analysing security events to identify suspicious activity.
  • Protection and Recovery to provide analysis and status updates of Azure Backup and Azure Site Recovery

The diagram below depicts a logical overview of the proposed Operations Management Suite environment.


Note: At the time of writing OMS supports Azure Backup and Site Recovery in Classic Mode.

Operations Management Suite Components

The components of Operations Management Suite are broken down into three areas, agent, dashboard and solution packs.

  • Agent is an in-guest service which can be pushed out automatically using Group Policy, System Center Configuration Manager or another deployment method. It is used to provide heartbeats and data back to the centralised Operations Management data repository
  • Dashboard is the Operations Management Suite portal which runs in a browser. The dashboard can be customised with graphical views of valuable searches and solutions
  • Solution Packs are add-on services which add functionality and provide in-depth analysis of collected data. Examples of commonly deployed Solution Packs are:
    • Malware Assessment which provides status of antivirus and antimalware scans across servers
    • Change tracking with tracks configuration changes across servers
    • System Update Assessment which identifies missing system updates across servers
    • AD Replication Status which identifies Active Directory replication issues
    • SQL Assessment which assesses the risk and health of SQL Server environments
    • AD Assessment which asses the risk and health of Active Directory environment

Microsoft are continuously updating Solution Packs and a few which are in public preview are listed below:

  • Azure Networking Analytics which enables you to gain insight into Network Security Groups and Application Gateway logs
  • Capacity and Performance which enables you to view Hyper-V CPU, memory and storage utilisation
  • Office 365 which provides visibility into user activities as well as forensics for audit and compliance purposes
  • Network Performance Monitoring which offers real time monitoring of parameters such as loss and latency
  • System Centre Operations Manager Assessment which asses the risk of your SCOM environment
  • VMWare Monitoring provides the ability to explore ESXi Host logs for monitoring, deep analysis and trending

The graphic below provides an example Operations Management Suite dashboard.



OMS uses the concept of workspaces which is primarily an administrative boundary but is also used to collect data within an Azure region.  Workspaces can be used to delegate responsibility to individual users or groups who undertake specific roles e.g. Network Team access to Network Performance Monitor.

It should be noted that workspaces are independent of each other and that data collected from each workspace cannot be viewed in another workspace.  However you can link multiple workspaces to a single Microsoft Azure subscription.

Workspaces also enable the use of different license plans, for example in one workspace you might use the System Center Add On and another workspace you might use Insight & Analytics.

Data Collection

Operations Management Suite collects data on a real time basis using either in-guest agents installed on Windows or Linux, a System Center Operations Management Group which uses the SCOM management servers to forward events and performance data to Log Analytics or finally an Azure Storage Account that collects data from PaaS and IaaS services.

  • Logging which is data generated by the operating system or application such as event logs, IIS logs, syslogs or custom logs in the form of text files.
  • Performance which uses the Windows or Linux performance counters to collect data such as memory, processor and disk information
  • Solution specific items which provide in-depth analysis of application items

A logical overview of data collection is shown below.



OMS can be licensed either on a pay as you go basis or on a subscription basis.  You are given the choice of licensing all OMS components together as a ‘suite’ which makes the overall cost cheaper or you can pick which components you need.

  • Licenses are based on nodes, a node is defined as a physical computer, virtual machine or network device
  • Node charges are hourly and nodes that only report for a part of a month are proratared
  • Each node can produce up to 500MB of data per day without incurring any extra charges
  • OMS data retention is currently set to one month, plans to expand this to two years are in the pipeline

Final Thought

OMS is maturing as a product and integration points to on-premises environment is evolving.  The ability to provide a centralised dashboard with application or vendor specific solution packs will make the product more appealing.  Watch this space!

Cheap(er) Microsoft Azure Exams

azure-skillPart of working in IT means keeping your skills relevant and up to date, which usually leads into taking exams on a regular basis.  Depending on your situation, exams maybe self or employer funded, so when a vendor has a certification offer, it’s worth taking note.

The usual cost of a Microsoft Azure exam with Pearson Vue is £135.60 inc. VAT (in the United Kingdom see Designing and Implementing Cloud Data Platform Solutions.

Later last year Microsoft launched ‘Advance your Azure skills‘ in a bid to get more individuals certified on their public cloud platform.  Using this URL will give access to the same exams but for £96.20 inc. VAT with a number of additional benefits which are:

  • Practice test for 30 days
  • One free retake
  • Access to Microsoft online Azure course catalogue

So what are you waiting for?  Now is the time to start cracking on with your Microsoft Azure exams!

70-533: Implementing Microsoft Azure Infrastructure Solutions – Prep & Exam Experience

mcsa-cloudplatform-logo-blkspec_impl_azure_infrasol_bwReaders of this blog know that my focus has shifted towards hybrid cloud and the architecture to enable customers to consume Microsoft Azure for varying requirements.

Having passed 70-534: Architecting Microsoft Azure back in March 2016, I had been putting off the  70-533 Implementing Microsoft Azure
Infrastructure Solutions
 due to the sheer volume of Azure work I was undertaking with customers which didn’t leave much time for studying.  Anyhow, I thought it was about time I sat the 70-533 exam which covers:

  • Implement Web Apps
  • Implement Virtual Machines
  • Implement Cloud Services
  • Implement Storage
  • Implement Azure Active Directory
  • Implement Virtual Networks


I went back over my previous blog posts on the following topics to make sure I was up to speed on the basics again.

Microsoft Azure Concepts – Availability Sets

Microsoft Azure Concepts – Backups

Microsoft Azure Concepts – Clusters

Microsoft Azure Concepts – Content Delivery Network

Microsoft Azure Concepts – Failures

Microsoft Azure Concepts – Identity & Access

Microsoft Azure Concepts – Media Services

Microsoft Azure Concepts – Mobile Apps

Microsoft Azure Concepts – Networks

Microsoft Azure Concepts – Network Security Groups

Microsoft Azure Concepts – SQL Data Warehouse

Microsoft Azure Concepts – Storage

Microsoft Azure Concepts – Virtual Machines

After I gotten my head around these again, I decided it was time to focus on the exam objectives that would present the greatest challenge which was performing tasks in PowerShell.

The difficulty was that the exam covers both the Azure Classic Deployment and Azure Resource Manager, so I found myself doubling up on commands.

ProTip: Like me, if you are not a PowerShell guru, then I suggest you use PowerShell ISE as it’s far more intuitive than just a command prompt!

I purchased the book Implementing Microsoft Azure Infrastructure Solutions by Michael Washam and Rick Rainey.  This is an excellent introduction to the exam, but I wasn’t convinced it would be enough to see me through the exam.

To compliment the book, I watched a number of Pluralsight videos on Implementing Microsoft Azure Infrastructure Solutions by Tim Warner which really helped plug any gaps I had.

As well as reading and watching the training material, I also spent time using Azure.  I’m lucky enough to have a work sponsored Azure Subscription I can access to play around.  I strongly suggest you are familiar with Azure and also you understand the basics of PowerShell commands.

The Exam

I decided to take the Microsoft Online Proctored exam with Pearson Vue.  I have to say that the security requirements where far higher than attending a Pearson Vue site, I literally had to empty my pockets and show the invigilator every part of the room I was sitting in twice.

A few things you should note about taking a proctored exam:

  • If you have an external monitor, they will make you turn it around
  • If you have a cup of coffee they will ask you to remove it from the room
  • They expect your desk to be completely clear, so no pen or paper for making notes

The exam itself was broken down into forty eight individual questions consisting of your usual multiple choice or drag and drop.

The exam expects you to know the blueprint and the material contained within it.  You also need to be able to understand when and why you would make technical decisions for example:

When would you choose yo use Point-to -Site over a Site-to-Site VPN.

Final Thought

I’m pleased to say I passed the 70-533 Exam.  It was challenging due as I don’t spend all my time implementing Azure solutions (especially on the PowerShell front).  In fact a lot of my time is spent researching new Azure features for customers to see if they stand up from a technical and commercial perspective.

Overall, I would recommend the exam to anyone looking to develop their understanding of Microsoft Azure.

It appears that when you pass both the 70-533 and 70-534 exam you become certified a MCSA: Cloud Platform.  So my advice, is pick up the books and crack on with some studying, things are moving to the cloud whether we like it or not!